FREE US SHIPPING ON ORDERS $175+
0 Cart
Added to Cart
    You have items in your cart
    You have 1 item in your cart
      Total

      Press — video game marketing

      Better Branding with Games

      Better Branding with Games

      Importance of Having Brand Games

      Branded games give your audience an extra way of interacting with your brand. Games are the only form of media that you have to actively engage in to utilize. While music and movies can be enjoyed from an engaged audience, most of that audience is consuming the media passively, with something else on their mind. Video games require active participation in order to continue the experience, which leads to higher consumer levels of engagement. Increased engagement with a brand will help keep customer retention and drive consumer promotion via word of mouth, which has been shown to be some of the most effective forms of customer acquisition.

      Branded games can increase purchases of your product or services. Due to increased engagement, customers not only feel more connected to the brand, but they also find themselves thinking about it more, and the often someone thinks about something, the more likely they are to buy that product, service, or the more likely they are to recommend it to a friend. These purchases can provide rewards in the game, giving positive reinforcement which will only add to customer engagement, which then leads to more purchases, and the cycle continues.

      The game can act as an avenue for sales and promotions. The use of the game as a platform to give out coupons and promote sales gives you a way to utilize the gaming market to further enhance engagement that will lead to the cycle of greater engagement and purchases.

      Games can be used as a tool rather than just for fun. Gamifying aspects of anything in daily life will enhance the user experience, so even if your brand game is for your internal sales department, the added level of entertainment can be used to drive performance and otherwise increase the value of your company.

      Games provide avenues of social sharing. Having a game that is addicting and fun to play can encourage players to share it with their friends. If that game then has a high score feature, the players may feel a need to one-up their friends leading to more game time and more engagement with the product, leading to greater brand engagement, bringing more customers in the engagement cycle for your business. If people can share their high scores to a wider audience, like on social media, not only will that share your name with a wide network of people, but it will be in an unexpected way. Unexpected advertising can gain customer attention in greater ways as they are less prone to tuning it out in the way that it happens when ads are in places people know, thus they cannot passively ignore them.

      Giving your app a theme, and releasing it at a key time can not only give you a way to engage with consumers at multiple times throughout the year, but can also help build your reputation. For example, apps related to Soccer/Football around the time of the World Cup explode in popularity in the months leading up to the championship game. An app like this for your business can reach a wider audience then you may normally reach because it takes advantage of other event editing that will cross promote your app, which means that any world cup promotion is in some way promotion for all World cup apps. This same ideology can be applied to events such as Summer/Winter Olympics, the SuperBowl, the Stanley Cup, or any other large event. These events can provide large seasonal promotions for your business that can be used to keep your business feeling fresh and connected to the people.

      Overall, giving your brand a game will utilize the gaming medium to leverage enhanced consumer engagement, and using this as a tool to create deeper engagement and customer retention. Using a game as a way to enhance consumer connections can be doubled as an extra avenue of communication and ways to keep connected, which is important as a way to find new ways to remain connected in a world of endless advertisements and information.


      How Mega Cat Studios Can Help:

      Mega Cat Studios has been committed to making apps and games for businesses as well as for ourselves. We are focused on the consumer and want to ensure that we are always providing the best experience possible rather than creating a product for a quick sell.  We have worked for companies to make apps for the Winter Olympics, for Woodstock, and apps that are used year-round. Our apps are used to increase branding for different companies across a wide variety of sectors, and we have worked on products for food companies, entertainment companies, public sectors, and more.

      Our headquarters is in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, but our team is distributed across the globe. Our team works to make sure that you’ll have the best game or platform to engage with your consumer base and keep them captivated with your brand, business, or company.

      Our company has been able to take the technical lead on products across all forms of media, giving us a diverse skill set that we can bring together in order to complete any project you have in mind. We can take the technical leadership on any upcoming or existing projects and lead you to a product that you’ll be ready to ship out to bring in new consumers as well as strengthening connections with your current consumer base.

      Mega Cat Studios has streamlined our communication system in house, letting us focus more time on you, and giving you the ability to communicate with us at every facet of production, ensuring that your product is exactly how you envisioned it.

      All-in-all, Mega Cat Studios is a group of dedicated gamers who are looking to share their love of gaming by making engaging products that will keep audiences entertained and continually engaging with your brand in order to keep consumers excited about your brand.

      The Coffee Crisis Lessons: 3 Game Design Choices That Drive Organic Marketing

      The Coffee Crisis Lessons: 3 Game Design Choices That Drive Organic Marketing

      As the indie scene has grown and as Steam has lowered visibility for indie developers on its platform, discoverability for smaller studios is an incredible challenge. Even when you do all of what the marketing the gurus tell you to do, meaningful traction is hard to come-by.

      Classic marketing advice usually includes some or all of the following:

      •         Press releases
      •         Soliciting reviews from bloggers and streamers
      •         Social media marketing
      •         Attending cons and expos
      •         Building your email list

      We go hard on all of these points, with physical and digital boots to pavement to drum-up exposure for our games, but we still feel like we have to claw and kick our way to every new player with these methods. That doesn’t mean they aren’t worth doing. It just means that by themselves they aren’t providing the number of players we think our games are capable of supporting.

      As we work with more publishers and as we become a more mature, experienced development team, we’re learning that key game design decisions can drive the organic traction and word-of-mouth marketing surrounding games, which means you need to think about marketing as you make the game, not after it’s completed.

      Here are three highlights from our process that are helping us find success:

      1.       Look at your game with a rogue-like lens. Even if your game doesn’t fall squarely in the rogue-like genre, introducing elements of randomization and variations in play experiences add a great deal of replayability and also make your game more fun to stream. If your game is a single-play kind of game, you will get much less screen time and therefore have fewer people talking about it for any period of time.
      2.       Twitch is a key organic channel, so test your game there as soon as you can. Giving streamers early copies of your game, even if it’s still in development, lets you see streamer and viewer reactions to your work before you’ve finalized all of the mechanics. For streamers, your game test sessions can be used for exclusive, private streams (if they so choose), and you get to learn about the potential traction of your game.
      3.       Stream integration will be a big deal in the near-future. Microsoft’s Mixer might not be the Twitch-killer they’re hoping for, but the stream integration technology is compelling. As streamers become even more important, expect viewers to be able to influence the gameplay, perhaps by voting on what happens next or donating to spawn bigger, badder enemies to torture the streamer. This is new, but we’re already seeing positive results from it.

      But how does that look in an actual game? This is what we are doing with Coffee Crisis:

      •         We looked at our code and found ways to make it modular, re-using and repurposing things we already made to extend replayability. Simple changes like adding shaders to characters to give them “elite” status all the way through building power-ups and randomized scenarios out of existing variables all come together to make the game more dynamic and to make each play-through feel different.
      •         We started testing with streamers early on and have continued streamer testing as we make changes and adjust features. Going through a big block of video—sometimes five hours or more of a single stream—can feel tedious, but it’s an invaluable window into your game’s future.
      •         We have also been working on Mixer integration, and the results there are also really exciting. Seeing viewers spawn more aliens to harass their favorite streamers (playfully) is always good for laughs, but more importantly it’s good for the streamers, their viewers, and for the gameplay experience.

      As we continue to grow, we’re leaning into these sorts of approaches to game design more and more. The industry is evolving, of course, and there will be new organic opportunities to explore there, but the evolution of streaming is particularly interesting and has a lot of potential for helping indie studios like ours get a foothold and directly engage gamers. I'd suggest any Indie of any size take advantage of this kind of opportunity to watch people play your games, give feedback, and see what really resonates with them.

      Videogame advertisements from the 1980’s to 2010.

      Videogame advertisements from the 1980’s to 2010.

      This document entails the analysis and study of retro videogame ads both in print and in video from the 1980s to the past decade of 2010.  Starting with a brief background of the subject, this research proposal expands on the history and why understanding where these videogame ads came from and how they have adapted within their time is important to market researchers. Questions are established and through a content analysis, resolution to the shifting trends and traits of these selected videogame ads will be found.

      Understanding how videogame ads have evolved in the studied 30 years is an essential principle and will build a foundation for further research studies in advertising, marketing, and even public relations related fields.  

      Introduction

      Videogames, since their creation they have stirred the masses and created a unique sense of accomplishment with audiences.  With their engaging atmosphere and constant evolution of visual appeal it’s no wonder why videogames have become such a popular activity.  Whether it’s to experience a winning touchdown at the super bowl, go-cart racing in outer space, battling invading aliens, or being the chosen one destined to save a captured princess, videogames, unlike other mediums of entertainment such as television, offer audiences a chance to not only observe the life around them, but to interact and become part of the world they are experiencing.  It is here through this medium, this dynamic and responsive “window to other worlds” that give way to videogames having such a huge fanfare.  Every year, various private and public conventions meet to establish new and exciting directions for videogames, and every year these events grow in number and popularity.  The purpose of this research proposal is simple, perform a content analysis on retro-videogame ads, whether they are print or video, from the 1980’s to the past decade ending 2010.  Considered by my collective research to be an extraordinary 30 years for videogames, it is important to study this era because through understanding where videogames and their ads have come from, we can better understand the types of players that exist today and what will be effective advertising campaigns.  Through a brief analysis of the said 30 years we will better understand why this time period is so important. In the literature review, we’ll explore the trends and what data has been collected thus far. From there, research questions will be established and ending with the methodology of a content analysis, the means to answer to these questions.

      Background and Evolving Trends

      Growing up on videogames, contrary to the stereotype, has helped me evolve into a (generally), happy, and healthy individual. I grew up in what is considered the 3rd generation of home-based videogame consoles.  The Nintendo Entertainment System (NES), was brought to the United States in 1985), two years after its launch in its native Japan in 1983.  The NES was my first experience with this interactive entertainment and since then, I have collected a selective number of home videogame consoles for my own.  However, I have never started to question my interest in collecting my select group of consoles until I purchased my own Sega Saturn two years ago.  The Saturn, being a 5th generation home console (released in 1995), is considered a very dated piece of hardware compared to its peers of today, yet the Saturn has established itself with the retro videogame community as a particular system with its own niche.  What made my fascination with the Sega Saturn grow?  Where did I even hear of the Sega Saturn, and why, for the love of most sane people, have I spent an extraordinary amount of money on a system I never owned as a child nor had it any contact?  

      Even as a child I was a videogame enthusiast, my NES was a gateway drug to more elaborate forms of entertainment.  Though, like most children, I seldom ever got what I always wanted, so I had to settle for the next-best thing – videogame magazines.  Even though I could not purchase one given my young age and inexperience with the world of finances, my frothing for information about videogames consoles and their respective games continued.  And as child who grew up during the 90’s, it’s not difficult to conclude where my interest in the Sega Saturn began, for my interest in the system did not go away but instead, it hibernated.

      Of course, this being a study from the 1980s to the end of 2010 it would be time-consuming to distinguish the videogame systems that spawned during these years.  As stated, those 30 years saw a great leap in technology and innovation when regarding videogame systems and their highlighted videogames.

      Referring to the image above, this timeline produced by the educational database online (www.onlineeducation.net) recaps not only the past 30 years, but also the earliest generations of videogames.

      As mentioned, the Nintendo Entertainment System started the 3rd generation of videogame consoles and from there companies like SEGA, SONY, and Microsoft dominated for supremacy.  As their respective technologies evolved so did their campaigns for consumers money. In Young’s article we reviewed that in early videogame system advertisements it was difficult for advertisers to find the right medium.  Does this radical new interactive technology fit in with the toys, clothing, electronics, or even accessories? To help with the introduction of this new technology, Japan based videogame company Nintendo, as seen below, showed audiences of the 1980s not only what their products are, but how to use them.  

      This action secured the company to its current status as a leader in the videogame market. Though this problem with identification of videogames is one of the past, we’re seeing a reoccurring theme in some cases. The videogame systems on today’s market are breaking the boundaries once again combining DVD/CD playback, Blu-Ray accessibility, internet browser compatibility and social media connections are all adding value to their respective console, yet blurring the lines of strict identification too.

      After finding their identity at the beginning of the 3rd generation thanks to Nintendo’s informative advertising, creative advertisers began seeing a market for showing audiences what these videogame systems could actually do.  Early ads that displayed people setting up and playing there videogame console were replaced with vibrant gameplay and flashy graphics.

      As displayed in the timeline, SEGA saw the success of the Nintendo in America and released a console of their own, the SEGA Genesis in 1988. The system boasted higher-end graphics and faster processing and along with their “Genesis Does what Nintendon’t” advertising campaign secured SEGA’s seat in the console war until the end of the 5th generation of videogame consoles in 1999.

      Similar to a timely political debate between two candidates, videogame consoles were put out in the spotlight and established their own version of mud-slinging.  However, having a more aggressive campaign than a console’s competitors doesn’t always equal success. In 1993 Atari attempted to make a comeback to the home-console market by pushing the audience to “Do the Math”, with their print and television commercials.  

      This campaign, sampled above, put the technical specs of Atari’s Jaguar up against the other systems of the 4th generation (Super Nintendo & SEGA Genesis).  Yet even with the numbers, Atari struggled and simply could not compete with the existing systems – consumers knew the math, but they weren’t impressed.  With the lack of 3rd party support for videogames, a difficult to use controller, and the promise of newer, more recognized systems from Nintendo and SEGA on the horizon, the Atari Jaguar’s failure was inevitable.

      However, with all the ads flowing for the videogame systems, we must not forget attention to the games.  Again, referring to the timeline above, it highlights some of the more influential and successful games released during the timeline.  Because the games were designed for people who either already own the system or are willing to consider buying the specific system, building brand loyalty was a needed attribute.  This exclusivity still exists today though, a handful of games are system specific and are more so than not, funded by console brands to stay that way.

      As you can see from the timeline, there were a lot of videogame consoles and subsequently, a lot of videogames released in those 30 years.  But the purpose of this research proposal is not to inform, but to analyze and code.  Take the following print ads below.

      The first print ad is for the videogame Wolverine (released in 1991), for the Nintendo Entertainment system.  Notice the screen shots with captions underneath them to the left?  They inform the audience of the game’s highlights as well as show in-game action and if that weren’t enough we have extensive copy running down the middle of the page for further information about the product.  Finally, our eyes trace to the bottom right where we have a picture of the game box itself, isolating the fact that you can purchase this game now and control the iconic character Wolverine of the X-Men popularity.  

      We can see comparisons between the second advertisements with the first.  They both feature screenshots with captions and they also both include a large graphic.  However, the comparisons stop there in which this ad for the videogame Xenogears (released in 1998) for the Sony Playstation limits the amount of copy. If we follow the formula of the first videogame ad we can assume that the two characters on the left have a sort of significance and/or importance.  Even though this is a new game with no previous recognizable characters like Wolverine is to the X-Men we have a general idea that these people play a strong and identifiable purpose in the videogame’s cannon Sure there are screen shots as well, but like the copy, they’re limited in depth. There is no box art depicting the game but instead we’re only given the system the game is available for purchase.

      Finally, the last ad is another full-page spread like the 2nd, this time it’s for the game Hitman: Blood Money (released in 2006), an on-going series in which the player assumes the role of a professional assassin.  Notice the lack of copy, and lack of screen shots in this ad.  To those who are not familiar with the Hitman series, who is he/she?  Is this our point character?  In fact, if I didn’t provide that exposition you probably would be asking the same questions.  We assume the game is about killing but what else?  What are its highlights? What are it’s features?  We know its release date and it’s for the Sony Playstation and Microsoft Xbox, but the ad lacks the informative substance the previous two print ads included.

      Literature Review

      The videogame market no longer consists of only children and teenagers as it did in its humble beginnings; but instead, an older generation has taken an interest.  Since the videogame boom in the 1980’s the children of that generation have grown up, and with jobs and money of their own are rekindling their excitement for this interactive medium (Ridlen, 2002).  Videogame developers have moved out of their respective basements and garages and into large, multi-leveled facilities with up to 50 plus members on their staff.  This change, along with business models, investors, development schedules, and a middle management all became attached to each new videogame project to ensure its overall quality and more importantly, its success.

      Simple videogame formulas such as making your way from one side of the screen to the other, while still in existence today, do not cut it as much as they used to back when the technology was limited.  With the growth of this industry, so has the growth of the tools that support them.  Computer coding for said videogames now requires an extensive knowledge of advanced language code and writing skills, C++, DirectX, and Open GL are all various types of graphic interface that usually, cannot be self-taught.  These languages create the framework for the 3D animators, illustrators, and graphic artists who from there, are like the directors, set designers, and producers of a big-budget movie (Ridlen, 2002).  

      Videogame Advertising

      Taking what is known so far, we compare videogames to their current peers – television and film.  As the technology advances, so do the mediums by which to portray the work needed for a polished product.  This takes time and most importantly, money.  The videogame industry is a multi-billion dollar industry because of its advancements in gameplay, interactivity, and design; money is needed to keep up with media rivalry, and not every major videogame developer can distribute the figures needed for a competitive product.  So where do many videogame developers receive their money?  The same way most TV and movies do, advertising.  

      There was a time when videogames mostly remained a relatively untapped market for advertisers.  As established in the Ridlen article, the videogame industry has grown up substantially.  With a focus on television and movies, advertisers were shoveling out billions for product placement, references, logos, and the like to be featured on the air or in theaters.  However, unlike videogames which can expose the audience anywhere from 5 to 100 plus hours of play time respectfully, television and movies are typically viewed by their audiences once or twice.  Videogames create a huge margin of exposure that has very little other mediums in which to compare itself.

      From here, we review the work of Chambers in his article “The Sponsored Avatar”, where he examines the practice of advertising within the perimeter of digital games.  Traditional media is on the decline, with the creation of TiVo and other digital recording devices for television, audiences that once predictably gathered in front of network television have become fragmented and distracted (Chambers, 2005).  Because of this, more than $300 million in annual advertising is being spent away from the traditional television commercial and instead, towards ad placement in television shows, movies and of course, videogames (2005).

      The Advergame, a term used to describe the developmental interest on the part of advertising agencies and game publishers to incorporate advertising into digital games; yet with no model or framework development there is no foundation for an optimum approach for such advertising messages (Chambers, 2005).  Like the internet, the advergame is a relatively new concept that is flooded with various directions and advertising messages leading to a saturation of content.  Because of this rush of persuasive messaging, creative strategies like product placement similar to that in TV shows and movies have been implemented in videogames disguised as realistic set pieces.  

      Chambers continues in his piece that there should be a sense of control when attempting to push one’s product and/or message through videogame advertising.  Keeping the integrity of the gaming experience should be the foremost factor and abandoning the gamers are geeks and geeks only persona are just two examples he presents to bring credibility to videogame advertising.  Chambers encouraging advertisers and advertising agencies not to approach in-game advertising as though it were a complete replacement for the 30-second commercial spot but instead, find creative ways to enhance the brand/product so that the player feels less pressured and more engaged into what message they are being sold.

      Since this publication, a huge leap forward in digital distribution has made its way combining online networking with today’s current videogame consoles.  Soft drink names, fast food franchises, and snack-food companies have been cross promoting their products with extra game content, exclusive in-game extras, and other player perks are now being integrated with their respective games.  While this is one of the more creative ways of advertising within the videogame space it is not the only one.  The previously mentioned videogame conferences and expos are now heavily sponsored by said brands like Mountain Dew, Burger King, and Doritos.  As expected as well, new videogame consoles market online accessibility, broadband and cellular networks like Comcast and Verizon have been pitching their services to players offering the fastest online connections for videogame downloads, media, and gameplay.  

      Measuring the Effects of Videogame Advertising

      In Branco Mommer’s study “Advertising our ‘soldiers’; Testing the Effectiveness of Ingame Advertising” we explore, as the name suggests, the effectiveness of in-game advertising and while it produced unexpected results, it is still a noteworthy article for exploring the shortcomings advertising and product placement still has to overcome to be truly effective in videogames. Focused whether or not playing a stimulating video game affected the memory of the displayed advertisements in a subsequent videogame was the core concept of the research.

      Mommer’s hypothesis expected Group A, playing an ad-abundant racing game with little to no car customization would yield stronger memory retention than Group B who played a different racing game with a racing track that featured little-to no ads and a higher car customization.  Contrary to the desired result, both groups tested in poor performance on the subsequent and post 6-month memory tests.  However, given the results presented in the study, limitations of the group were abounding.  The amount of time playing both selected games was very minimal, perhaps Mommer was looking for a “Magic Bullet Theory” like effect in which given aggressive stimuli, and the message/advertisement – would have a stronger impact on the memory, yet this was not the case.  Another limitation presented was the way in which the study was developed between the participants (2008). Videogames, majority, are used as a recreational, or competitive activity.  Presented in this case however, may have influenced the group playing the videogames – if they’re not playing for fun or personal accomplishment, then an apathetic feel could be factored (2008).

      While the study produced results that were not expected, there is still validity in the study.  Perhaps future researchers could build on the shortcomings of Mommer’s study to produce stronger and expected results.  Could the participants, who, we assume, were all avid videogames have been desensitized?  Similar in stating that the media has made us desensitized to violence, could this term also be represented in advertisements and applied to videogames as well?

      Even with Mommer’s study, there is still research and continuing efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of advertising in videogames.  Persuasive manners such as the mentioned aggressive “Magic Bullet Theory” and the more subtle messages all integrate within videogame adspace - whether they are using videogames as a vehicle by the advertising agencies is debatable.  Chambers expressed similar research to that of Adrian Perez, 2009 and Ian Bogost, 2007 who all approached videogame advertising with a comprehensive and rhetorical view.  

      While Perez, in his thesis “Exploring the possibilities of Videogames as an advertising platform”, believes that videogame advertising is still too new to fully utilize given the current control standards, similar to Chamber’s view.  He is optimistic, and like Chambers, believes that guidelines are required to understand the impact of videogame advertising.  Evaluating with the current methods given today, there are too many requirements and grey areas that could decide the effectiveness of an ad (2009).  

      Ian Bogost however, in his article “Persuasive Games. The Expressive Power of Videogames”, encourages that videogames are readily available for advertising and similar persuasive outlets.  Through context, he continues, can a desired outcome be observed, even if it is not intended from the beginning (2007). Applying this idea, it is theoretically possible to deduce an outcome were there enough research into the desired target audience and medium message.

      So far in the articles presented we’ve seen the growth of a huge industry that involves way more than its simple beginnings.  Corporate sponsors, private investors, and celebrity like status for some of the more major developers have all boomed along with the videogame world.  And with that boom in mind, there is no denying the influence and appeal videogames have to advertisers that can equal the power and exposure of their products and/or messages.  But what about advertising for the videogames themselves, how does videogame advertising work for the actual products people will play?  

      Advertising Videogames

      Moving away from videogame advertisements, we twist those two words to create a new direction – advertising videogames. In the article “The Disappearance and Reappearance and Disappearance of the Player in Videogame Advertising” by Bryan Young,  he breaks down the origin of the television first, incorporating its relationship with videogame add-ons for home use. Young explores the interest audiences have with not only the moving pictures on their television set, but how audiences could become active participants in what they see.  Using early print advertisements of the rudimentary, yet addictive game Pong (released for home consoles in 1972), Young examines and deconstructs the ads to show how difficult it was for advertisers to inform the consumer about the game and what all it was about.  By placing the Pong ads with other products like sweaters and alarm clocks advertisers were trying to figure out where exactly this videogame fit best with its counterparts (Young, 2007).  

      Early consumers who had no idea of what a videogames (or videogame systems) were had to rely on rudimentary television commercials to actually show audiences how it all worked.  Plugging in the system, inserting the game cartridge, pushing the ON switch are all directions which are second nature to us now – but early videogame ads took the responsibility and held valuable guidelines to their prospective and curious customers.  Young focuses on the Nintendo videogame company and from their Nintendo Entertainment System (NES), to today’s relevant Nintendo Wii.  He studies the steps made to ensure their target audiences was me with a direct, constant message with advertising videogames – furthermore establishing how videogames were not just a passing fad.

      Young establishes a good foundation of early advertising for videogames and explains the importance of their commercials in the early ages for inexperienced audiences.  These type of commercials are in a non-existence today and are instead replaced with CGI images of the game, though, ironically, not the game in action itself.  Instead, audiences are exposed to scenarios that while you can do in the actual game, are not as stylized or elaborate as the commercials show.  Showing various gameplay for a videogame was a much stronger pitch for earlier competitive systems that portrayed differences in graphics and style.  But compared to the systems of today, the games look generally the same no matter what system you’re playing.

      Why Are We Attracted?

      So what exactly makes the videogame world so attractive?  Where, in the binary and coding does the reception come into play and why has it been such an effective entertainment market?  To answer this question, we review “In Search of the Videogame Player”, a detailed article discussing the interaction of players by James Newman.

      Newman’s article presents findings from two studies that highlight the analytical and methodological weakness of videogame play and encourages a more sensitive approach to investigating and interpreting the medium’s composition.  He takes his findings and, as the name of the article suggests, searches for how the player fits into the dichotomy of the videogame he or she is playing.  What is their role?  Who are they to be?  Why are they so motivated?  These are just some of the analytical questions Newman asks and, for the most part, answers.  

      Players are engaged at the level of first-hand experiential participation. Not only that, but players fill the role of both the motivation and observer.  They blend sequences of high-level interaction (gameplay), with segments of an almost movie-like spectatorship (in-game cinematics) (Newman, 2004).  Videogames, according to Newman, blur the boundaries between an active and passive participant creating unique and integrating modes of engagement.  

      Though published in 2004, like Chambers in 2005, we have to take Newman’s research and observation and attempt to integrate it with today’s videogame design.  Controllers held strictly in the hands of the player are not the only option of interactivity.  Voice, facial, weight, and body movement control have also been a newly added trait in today’s videogames.  Using these new technologies, new audiences are being targeted for advertising videogames.  Examples such as exercising product accessories, weight trainers, and brain stimuli games are being sold to an older and even younger video game market.

      In regards to advertising in videogames, many of the articles covered suggested that the medium is still too new to process and measure accordingly.  Without a set of guidelines to follow and adhere to it is difficult to deduce the desired result of advertising in videogames.  Expression of videogames continues to evolve with the technology that helps support them.  Comparisons with the internet work best to understand how new videogames are as an advertising medium.  This level of ambiguity is mirrored with the process videogame advertising.  They started with meek and informative ads but due to their interactive nature it was difficult to categorize videogames and draw relationships to where they first belonged.  

      Tschang (2005), Keum (2004), and Dardis (2012) all explore the evolution of the videogame and give predictions as to where their direction in advertising will take them.  Starting with a focus on family relations videogame advertisements have branched to respect a more single-player campaign.  However, with the technology available to play with/against others over the internet, a new market has been established giving the availability to play with complete strangers.

      What separates videogames from most mediums is the level of interactivity.  As established, videogames are not passive media.  They are in fact, alive and are willing to share their views, ideas, creativity, and experiences with anyone willing to explore new scenarios and lives.  It is this level of direct feedback that set videogames beyond any methods of persuasion and involvement.  Rather than just reading and watching in-game advertising (for example), the player could explore the ad portrayed to them.  From all the readings though, the element of change is a constant.  Change in technology, messages, and advertising methods will always be in abundance when it comes to the videogame game.

      Research Questions

      Evaluating the background of videogame ads and the researched material in the literature review, several questions have evolved to create the backbone to the purpose of this study.  By answering these questions a foundation into further research could be developed and built upon in the future.  

      By identifying the audience of videogames (if a generalization can be concluded) how can that knowledge best be used for the advertising edge?

      Do production values in the represented videogame ads influence the given advertisement and if so, does this result in a higher audience interest?  

      Studying the evolution of videogame ads from the 1980s to 2010 what elements have been removed, added, and changed to reach the videogame audiences of that decade?

      By answering these questions we will have a better understanding of the culture and lifestyle of the videogame consumer.  Though this proposal does not state the exact outcome of the suggested analysis other branches from the conducted research could be split and elaborated.  

      Method

      The literature review covered various aspects of the dual-identity of videogame advertising and advertising videogames.  However, when looking back on the literature, I used Mommer’s study to explore the relationship with the effects of videogame advertising. Yet, there was no such treatment of study or experiment when discussing advertising videogames.  This content analysis would fill in the missing correlations and in doing so, will also provide answers to the asked research questions.

      The study is going to focus on 20 randomly selected videogame ads, each from the 80s, 90s, and to the end of 2010.  From theses 20 selected ads 10 print and 10 video/TV ads will be acquired through the use of varied websites and studied in a similar fashion that was used to compare the general ads above.  Of course, this study is going to be more in depth than what was previously done simply as an example.  The sample audience will be voluntarily selected male and female Graduate students from a convenient university.  Gradute students are preferred due to their strong diversity of age and this will help keep the audience varied as well as from different backgrounds and stages of life.  College professors will also be included to participate should they like.  Extra credit, course requirement, and/or reward incentive will be provided given the available circumstances. The research would provide empirical evidence of how videogame ads have changed and whether or not advertisers have created stereotypes to categorize their audience and cater to.

      Expected results will support my idea that throughout the 30 years of videogame advertisements, the ads themselves have become more visual-focused and non-informative.  Similar to that of a movie trailer, they produce elaborate set pieces and drama to encourage the audiences to fill in the blanks and build stronger curiosity than the humble informative and context heavy beginnings of the 1980 videogame advertisements.

      Conclusion

      What sets my research apart from the literature I reviewed is the fact that I’ve been not only a player of videogames but a retailer of them as well.  Inside knowledge fueled by my own curiosity and not so much relevant topics can give my content analysis a stronger foothold and thus, provide with personal results – and while my peers may view my current interest as a biased project I disagree.  Too many articles I have read, while the topics featured are of personal interest in the subject material, fell below expectations because the researcher was limited and did not consider all the options presented to them before conducting their analysis.

      The importance of this study is, as stated, not only to evaluate the videogame ads of previous, but also to elaborate on the kind of message advertisers are using today.  Television and internet advertising spots have adopted a more movie and cinematic take, as oppose to people actually playing the videogame and showing their level of interactivity.  Does this method persuade audiences that videogame players are isolated individuals with no life other than what they see on their computer monitor or television? Can this attitude change and more importantly, what will the attitude change into?  I would find the answer to these questions and more through my research.

      -originally document and research by Will Gorusch